\"Writing.Com
Printed from https://www2.writing.com/main/authors/action/reviewers
The Writing.Com members below are accepting review requests and ready to review your item! Peruse the list, check out members' review styles and request a review from anyone who seems like a good fit for your item.
Registered Author
Maddie Stone <2026 Edition> Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
My goal is to give a detailed, organized review that highlights the positive characteristics of the work, while also touching on any areas that might benefit from some editing. All of my reviews are, of course, just suggestions and meant to be helpful to the author. I am always available via WDC email if more input is needed on any aspect of the review.
dnadream's Portfolio
Preferred Author
~SilverMoon~ Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I look at the title, premise, overall structure first. Then I see how it makes me feel. After that, I might comment on little errors which are easily fixed.
Registered Author
Enthusiasm Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I dissect stories like a surgeon with a poet’s hands—probing the emotional marrow, not just the bones. My reviews prioritize thematic resonance, psychological authenticity, and prose that feels before it explains. I’ll ask why the rain in your story smells like regret, or how the silence between lovers becomes its own character. Technical critiques (pacing, grammar) come only if requested—I’m here to unravel why your story haunts, not just how it functions.
Registered Author
The Uplifting Essayist Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Friends, 1. I always like to look at the positive aspects of the story I am reviewing and highlight them. 2. This is because I firmly believe in the principle, "The best building is that building which stands on the strongest foundation." 3. And I believe that the strongest foundation, in the case of a story, is that of appreciation and gratitude for its author. Essayist
knightly's Portfolio
Registered Author
Blank Page Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
While I consider myself apt enough to provide decent, kind feedback, I'm not the sort of person to laud a man's writings. Instead, I seek to find smaller, more intricate points of interest within their writings so that I might offer suggestions and feedback so that they might better aid the flow of their work.
Preferred Author
Mousethyme-no romance Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Casual. More my opinion than, say, most reviewers.
rennur's Portfolio
Preferred Author
Geoff Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I don't like using a template. I don't like correcting spelling. I don't like correcting grammar. I don't want to be your editor. I enjoy discussing what I have read. I am very happy to tell people what I have liked and what I have disliked. There is not a lot that I dislike.
Preferred Author
Indelible Ink Author Icon
(minimum 5,000 GPs)
I try to imagine I've just taken a seat in the waiting room at a doctor's office and picked up a magazine to pass the time. Suddenly - what's this? - I stumble upon your little work of art. As a result of reading your story, either I will 1) I like it so much I MUST have it, so I stuff the magazine down the front of my shirt and hope the doctor isn't checking my heartbeat today, or 2) Become so nauseated at the ineptitude displayed by your chicken scratches that I will beg the doctor to consider me for an emergency euthanasia. Chances are it will be somewhere in the middle.
Preferred Author
Than Pence Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I am thorough. The technical aspects are important to me as much as if the story makes sense. The word "cruel" has been used before when responding to a review I've given, but in an appreciative and kind way.
elfmage7's Portfolio
Moderator
Dawn Embers Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Disclaimer: I am not good at remembering to do requested reviews. Often I have busy things going on with work and my own novels, so sorry if I decline or don't remember to do a review in the short time given. Just a warning. When I review: Long. Depending on the type of story and reason for review I tend to get anywhere from 4,000 characters to on the rare occasion over 10,000. I will make overall comments, technical points and even offer sources when necessary but a lot is dependent on what I'm reviewing. I can even do a full edit but that's take a lot of niceness and time.
Preferred Author
Lexi Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I am honest, but kind and encouraging. I will offer ideas if something strikes me.
wyrd_naos's Portfolio
Preferred Author
WyrdNaos Trippin' on Yello Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I like to be analytical in my reviewing. The most interesting pieces of writing often work on a number of different levels, and so I try to consider multiple perspectives when informing the author of what I liked or disliked about their piece. For this reason, I don't get along very well with templates, as I find they turn the whole process into something very clinical! You can expect my reviews to be a fluid, tailored discussion of your individual work.
Preferred Author
Beholden Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I have a review template that is only used for in depth reviews, usually those that are specifically requested. These will be as comprehensive as I can manage, including everything I have noticed in reading the piece. Most of my reviews, however, are more in the nature of reactions to the piece with brief notes on things I find particularly good and suggestions on dealing with any obvious flaws in the writing.
jaejaeme's Portfolio
Registered Author
Just Jae Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I have experience looking for consistency. I fully believe in Keep It Simple & Succinct. *Smile*
lbidler's Portfolio
Preferred Author
lbidler Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
As a reviewer of your work, I will first look for identification in what you are presenting. When a reader can truly identify with the writer, emotion sets in and the story becomes a part of the reader as well as the writer.
Preferred Author
Jellyfish Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I like to always pick out the positive points in a piece, even if overall I am not enamoured by it. I tend to point out grammatical and spelling errors. I will be honest, but not unkind *Smile*
rbriley48's Portfolio
Preferred Author
Richard Briley Jr Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I’m not a technical reviewer but I will sometimes make suggestions or recommendations for improvements. I typically judge by the content of the piece.
aundria_k's Portfolio
Preferred Author
Angels in my Ear Author Icon
(minimum 2,500 GPs)
I enjoy reviewing and try to be as honest as possible. I look for specific things such as technical merit, flow and lyrical quality in poems, creativity, tone, and mood. Though I can be a tough critic, I strive to encourage writers to grow and challenge themselves. I feel that it is through constructive criticism that we grow as writers. I strive to give the writer feedback on the overall impact of the piece. I am the host and judge of the "Shadows and Light Poetry ContestOpen in new Window. and co-host of the "Roots & Wings ContestOpen in new Window.
vocab's Portfolio
Registered Author
vapid Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I tend to try and be fairly succinct, I have a deep love for verbose and interesting language, taking large preference to poetry. If you want some critique or suggestion on such, I'd be happy to help!
soledad_moon's Portfolio
Preferred Author
Elisa, Stik of Clubs Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
In a single word, thorough. I will turn your piece upside down, shake the change out of its pockets and look at even the most minute details. I can be technical but will do so when emphasizing a larger point about the piece as a whole.
Printed from https://www2.writing.com/main/authors/action/reviewers