*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
Printed from https://www2.writing.com/main/authors/action/reviewers
The Writing.Com members below are accepting review requests and ready to review your item! Peruse the list, check out members' review styles and request a review from anyone who seems like a good fit for your item.
Registered Author
Cupadraig~The Remote Country
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I'm not sure what this means. I am honest in my review(s) and try to offer constructive advice when I find something amiss. I also enjoy pointing out what works for me in your story so you get equal positive. I want to help you get better. That's why we are here.
james_patrick's Portfolio!
Registered Author
James Heyward
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Generally long winded... I tend to hone in on aspects of a story that I feel the author underdeveloped and then encourage them to enhance them. My style is a bit chaotic, as I jump from element to element depending on how large they loom in my mind. I may one day employ a template,to cover plot, theme, characters, settings, etc.. but for now I just comment on the parts of the story I feel compelled to address. Because my own spelling and grammar is atrocious, I leave those suggestions to your spellcheck and the more technical reviewers kind enough to visit your work.
Preferred Author
A*30s*Faith
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Honest and methodical.
Preferred Author
QueenNormaJean HoHoHumbuggery
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I like to give friendly advice that I hope will help, not harm.
aundria_k's Portfolio!
Preferred Author
My Mothers Angel in my Ear
(minimum 2,500 GPs)
I enjoy reviewing and try to be as honest as possible. I look for specific things such as technical merit, flow and lyrical quality in poems, creativity, tone, and mood. Though I can be a tough critic, I strive to encourage writers to grow and challenge themselves. I feel that it is through constructive criticism that we grow as writers. I strive to give the writer feedback on the overall impact of the piece. I am the host and judge of the "Shadows and Light Poetry Contest and co-host of the "Roots & Wings Contest
achawbaker's Portfolio!
Registered Author
Allie Gal
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I like to take my time with the reviews looking for both strengths and mistakes while getting to know the story. I am fairly detailed and work well on a sentence by sentence level. Let me know if you would prefer a detailed review or a more general, big picture review.
forgiveness's Portfolio!
Preferred Author
Sorji
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
While I will give input on any spelling, grammar, and punctuation, I much prefer to rate based on how the content flows and feels to me as a reader. Even if there is room for improvement, I always prefer to stay on the positive side of things. To be honest, every writer has room for improvement. We're all works in progress.
Registered Author
The Lost One
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I am an honest person, at least I think so, and I will give you my opinion. Never with a harsh meaner of course, simply what I think works or does not work.
Registered Author
Perry Ride
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Hi, this is Perry. I love to review especially newbies. I try my best in reviewing with honesty. Poems is what I review the most. I deeply examine the lines and pin point the necessary corrections if needed. Short stories of around 1000 words are also warmly welcomed. If you are looking for an honest and meaningful review, you can reach me. Good luck!
strategos101's Portfolio!
Registered Author
Joseph Mack
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
My style is varied for the most part meaning that sometimes I feel it necessary to comment on grammar and other times the flow of the story as an example. I will always try to be sensitive of your feelings for I know that writing is hard and personnel but even though this is true I still want to be as helpful as I can.
Preferred Author
bob county
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I look at the fun factor.
vocab's Portfolio!
Registered Author
vapid
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
My review style is what's known as going for the throat, so if your on board for someone who won't gently tip toe around the subject but crush said toes, I'm the reviewer for you.
pgarraud's Portfolio!
Registered Author
thesuperpapagai
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I tend like to focus my reviews on commenting about how well a story is told and try to show my emotional reactions to it. I try not to focus on minor things like grammar and typos, but I will point out technical mistakes if they're egregious. While I'll make an effort to point out things I like, I tend to focus my reviews on what can be improved. I don't go into exact changes to make, as I feel that you, as the writer, would no better what works with your work.
Registered Author
C.R. Rathkamp
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Questions dictate love, isn't that correct?
Preferred Author
Regrettableink
(minimum 5,000 GPs)
I try to imagine I've just taken a seat in the waiting room at a doctor's office and picked up a magazine to pass the time. Suddenly - what's this? - I stumble upon your little work of art. As a result of reading your story, either I will 1) I like it so much I MUST have it, so I stuff the magazine down the front of my shirt and hope the doctor isn't checking my heartbeat today, or 2) Become so nauseated at the ineptitude displayed by your chicken scratches that I will beg the doctor to consider me for an emergency euthanasia. Chances are it will be somewhere in the middle.
billiegail's Portfolio!
Registered Author
BillieGail memory of Cheyenne
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I will copy all of your mistakes for you to see so, that you can correct them. I am kind and supportive, but will be honest about what I think it is lacking. I love reviewing poetry and short stories mainly. I will review anything though. I will always lift you up and never tear you down. You will find inspiration in my reviews.
Moderator
Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
In depth, detailed, and supportive.
Preferred Author
KnightScribe
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I focus on plot and characters. Stories I really get into I break down looking at grammar and spelling. I am honest to the core of my reviews and I like to extend as much grace as I can to new writers (cause we've all been there). As far as star ratings go:*Five stars means I think you can publish it.*Four and a half stars means I think just a few changes need to be made (mostly spelling and grammar).*Four stars mean there is something either in the plot, or characters, that aren't working.*Three and a half stars means it's above average for a WDC item, which means revise it once and then call me.*Three stars mean it's an average WDC item, which means revise it once, or twice, and then call me.*Two and a half stars means it's below average for a WDC item, which means something major to the story isn't working.*Two stars means most everything has gone wrong.*One and a half stars means that the only redeeming factor is the premise.*One star means WTF!
orchidslvr2914's Portfolio!
Registered Author
Leslie Double L Lomack
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Is honest, encouraging, and very helpful.
Preferred Author
Beholden
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I have a review template that is only used for in depth reviews, usually those that are specifically requested. These will be as comprehensive as I can manage, including everything I have noticed in reading the piece. Most of my reviews, however, are more in the nature of reactions to the piece with brief notes on things I find particularly good and suggestions on dealing with any obvious flaws in the writing.
Printed from https://www2.writing.com/main/authors/action/reviewers